Context
Peer-reviewed EMNLP Findings research introduces evidence-based generation (EBG), requiring line-level citations and a joint answer-and-evidence metric. Controlled evaluations identify incomplete multi-passage retrieval and loss of document-level context as limitations of similarity-based chunked RAG.
What changed
The authors introduce EBG with line-level citations and Ans+Evid evaluation, test reformulated MultiHop-RAG and QASPER-MP plus synthetic long-context benchmarks, and distinguish finding any relevant passage from retrieving every necessary evidence span.
Why it matters
AI discovery pipelines can retrieve a source without gathering enough passages to support a multi-part answer. Answer-only evaluation and raw citation counts can miss incomplete grounding.
Visibility OS interpretation
Visibility OS interpretation: measure evidence completeness, preservation of document context and answer-to-citation support separately from retrieval hits and final citation frequency.
What remains uncertain
Do these patterns hold for live commercial AI search systems with proprietary retrieval and citation selection? How often do full-document context and citation completeness change publisher exposure?