Context
Chen and colleagues introduced ITER, a dense retriever trained with agent interaction trajectories that incorporates the main question, earlier subqueries and pre-search reasoning when retrieving evidence for subsequent search steps.
What changed
Instead of treating each agent-generated subquery independently, ITER learns from interaction history and uses previously useful documents as redundancy negatives. The revised preprint evaluates the method across six agent backbones.
Why it matters
Multi-step agentic discovery is path-dependent: the same current subquery can be evaluated in light of earlier questions and visited evidence. Source visibility measurement should consider complete search trajectories.
Visibility OS interpretation
Visibility OS treats ITER as evidence about controlled iterative retrieval architecture, not as proof that ChatGPT Search, Google AI Mode or Perplexity deploy this method.
What remains uncertain
How well does the technique transfer to live web indexes and commercial agents? How sensitive are gains to the choice of trajectory supervision and search tool?